Link from:
http://lawandbiosciences.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/more-on-no-lie-mri-case/
"Hank Greely and Emily Murphy at the Center for Law & the Biosciences located at Stanford University. "I don't think it is anywhere near sufficiently proven to be used today," said Greely, a law professor who heads up the center. "And premature use not only risks harming people's lives, but potentially harming neuroscience by overpromising and under-delivering," on the technology."
CEO Joel Huizenga speaks.
http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2009/04/02/science/953mri040109.txt
Showing posts with label No Lie MRI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label No Lie MRI. Show all posts
Friday, April 3, 2009
Thursday, March 26, 2009
No Lie MRI NOT being offered as evidence in court
http://lawandbiosciences.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/request-to-admit-no-lie-mri-report-in-california-case-is-withdrawn/
Gary Seiser to Stanford Center for Law and Bioscience:
"...Now I understand both the great potential of fMRI for lie detection, and the many hurdles yet to be overcome before it is ready for the courtroom. It has definitely been a learning experience.
As you know, this week the proponents of the evidence withdrew their request to have it admitted, thus ending the issue in our case. I won’t speculate on why they did that. I will only say I was confident that with all the help I had received, you assisting as co-counsel, and Marc Raichle on the stand, we would have prevailed. In a way, we did."
Gary Seiser to Stanford Center for Law and Bioscience:
"...Now I understand both the great potential of fMRI for lie detection, and the many hurdles yet to be overcome before it is ready for the courtroom. It has definitely been a learning experience.
As you know, this week the proponents of the evidence withdrew their request to have it admitted, thus ending the issue in our case. I won’t speculate on why they did that. I will only say I was confident that with all the help I had received, you assisting as co-counsel, and Marc Raichle on the stand, we would have prevailed. In a way, we did."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
"Not by strength, by guile."